Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of CPAP therapy compared to no treatment in the management of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in Colombia from a third-party payer perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct cost-utility and budget impact analysis of providing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy versus no treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Colombia from a third-party payer perspective. METHODS: We used a Markov model to assess the cost-utility and budget impact analysis of CPAP in patients over 40 years old with moderate to severe OSA. Data on effectiveness and utility values were obtained from published literature. A discount rate of 5% was applied for outcomes and costs. ICER was calculated and compared against the threshold estimated for Colombia, which is 86% of the GDP per capita. RESULTS: Over a lifetime horizon, the base case analysis showed the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained with CPAP therapy was COP$3,503,804 (USD$1,011 in 2020 prices). The budget impact analysis showed that the adoption of CPAP therapy in the target population would lead to a cumulative net budget impact of COP$411,722 million (USD$118,784,412 in, 2020 prices) over five years of time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP was cost-effective compared to no-treatment in OSA. According to the budget impact analysis, adopting this technology would require a budget allocation that is partially offset by reduced number of strokes and traffic accident events.

Tratamiento quirúrgico por otorrinolaringología en el síndrome de apnea-hipopnea obstructiva del sueño (SAHOS) / Surgical treatment by otorhinolaryngology in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)

Resumen El síndrome de apnea-hipopnea obstructiva del sueño (SAHOS) se caracteriza por la obstrucción parcial o el colapso total de la vía aérea superior, de manera intermitente y repetitiva, por lo que, en un principio, se vio el manejo quirúrgico como una alternativa curativa para esta patología. Sin embargo, en la actualidad se reconoce que la cirugía, aun sin lograr tasas de efectividad muy altas de manera consistente, sí mejora la tolerancia y adaptación a la terapia de presión positiva, la cual sigue siendo la primera línea de manejo. Así, el primer paso antes de pensar en cualquier procedimiento quirúrgico es un adecuado diagnóstico topográfico, de modo que siempre se debe realizar una nasofibrolaringoscopia para identificar el o los sitios de obstrucción. Además, se sabe que el 75% de los pacientes presentan obstrucciones en múltiples niveles y que, cuando el abordaje se hace multinivel, se logra corregir el SAHOS hasta en un 95%. Entre los procedimientos vigentes se encuentran cirugías de nariz, paladar blando, amígdalas, base de lengua, estimulación del nervio hipogloso y procedimientos del esqueleto facial, así como procedimientos coadyuvantes, entre los que están radiofrecuencia e implantes de paladar.

Abstract Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is characterized by the partial obstruction or total collapse of the upper airway in an intermittent and repetitive manner; in this scenario, surgical management was initially regarded as an alternative for treating this pathology. Nowadays, surgery is highly recognized because it improves tolerance and adaptation to positive pressure therapy; it remains as the first line of treatment, although high rates of effectiveness are not achieved. The first step before considering any surgical procedure is an adequate topographic diagnosis; therefore, a nasofibrolaryngoscopy should always be performed to identify the obstruction site(s). It is known that 75% of patients have obstructions at multiple levels, so correcting OSAHS by up to 95% is possible when the approach considers all the levels. Current procedures include nasal surgery, soft palate, tonsils, tongue base, hypoglossal nerve stimulator and facial skeletal procedures, as well as adjuvant procedures that include radiofrequency and palate implants.